Urban Land Institute
Close

Governors Island

 

Context

Located in New York Harbor between the boroughs of Manhattan and Brooklyn, Governors Island had a military presence from the late 1700s until 1996, for the U.S. Army and the Coast Guard. In 2003, the island came under control of the city and state of New York. Redevelopment commenced in 2010 when design firm West 8 won an international competition and presented the resulting Governors Island Park and Public Space Master Plan. Construction on a 40-acre (16.2 ha) public park began in 2012 and the park opened in 2016.

With over 1 million annual visitors, Governors Island consists of the park—which includes lawns, playgrounds, sports fields, food vendors, and a series of earthwork hills (the Hills) that provide panoramic views of the harbor and surrounding skylines—and education, nonprofit, and commercial facilities. In partnership with local organizations, Governors Island is intended to engage, excite, and educate the public in every aspect of urban agriculture, green infrastructure, and sustainability.

New York City’s average sea levels have risen by more than one foot (0.3 m) over the past century, a number that is double the global average. This, coupled with the reality of intensifying storms and floods, made prioritizing resilience to floods and extreme weather events top of mind for the redevelopment team. From the outset, the team saw it vital to embed climate resilience goals into all design and planning considerations. Many features of the park’s design address the impacts of climate change, including raising the site out of the 100-year floodplain, implementing a sustainable planting strategy, and mitigating wave action.

The park led to the creation of 40 acres (16.2 ha) of new public open space and the preservation of much more while making the area and its active and passive recreation choices accessible to millions of New Yorkers, many of whom lack access to high-quality park space. Combined with the park’s resilience measures, its focus on holistic sustainability is especially important for equitable open space access amid the climate crisis, given the proximity to low-lying areas in Manhattan and Brooklyn that will rely on Governors Island for park access and recreation.

Resilience and Sustainability Strategies

Resilient and sustainable design strategies are central to Governors Island, especially since it is poised to become a demonstration site to showcase new ways of developing and implementing climate resilience measures.

While the Hills on the island’s southern portion are the most visible icon of its resilient design approach, all of the park’s new landscapes incorporate native or locally adapted species chosen for their tolerance to salt and increasing temperatures as well as root structures that can reduce erosion.

Just five months after work began at Governors Island, Hurricane Sandy hit the park in 2012, putting its design strategies to the test. Although still under construction, the park sustained almost no damage. The park’s climate resilience and sustainability strategies include the following:

  • Addressing flooding and sea-level rise: To protect the island from sea-level rise, the site was raised based on flood data projections for 2100. On the island’s western side, the existing seawall was replaced with a riprap revetment to provide stronger protection from wave action by dissipating the energy of waves. The white seat edges/park benches found throughout the park offer a dual purpose for visitors to relax and protect the Hills against wave action during storm surges.
  • Stormwater management: The original site had over 19 acres (7.7 ha) of impermeable paved surfaces, creating excess runoff into the New York Harbor and hindering effective stormwater management. Addressing this, the park’s redesign team replaced those impermeable surfaces with plantings, lawn, and permeable paving to improve the island’s stormwater absorption capability.
  • Mitigating extreme heat and the urban heat island effect: The New York City Department of Health estimates that, on average, 370 people suffer heat-related deaths per year in the city. Responding to this alarming figure, the park seeks to boost nature-based solutions to mitigate heat in a city well known as a concrete jungle. With the removal of impervious asphalt and prioritizing green infrastructure, the park’s native and locally adapted shrubs, trees, and plantings help reduce the urban heat island effect and mitigate extreme heat.
  • Enhancing biodiversity: The park’s raised landscape lifts new trees and shrubs out of the flood zone, vital for the long-term survival of plants in floods. New plants at the park include 1,500 new trees at Hammock Grove and 860 new trees and 41,000 shrubs at the Hills. The park’s plantings and placements were carefully thought out to ensure their long-term viability. For example, grasses able to withstand brackish water were placed on lower-lying areas of the park while other plantings were chosen based on their tolerance to salt and future higher temperatures.
  • Supporting urban agriculture and access to fresh foods: Governors Island hosts the GrowNYC Teaching Garden, a one-acre (0.4 ha) urban farm that aims to engage and educate visitors in all aspects of urban farming. The farm’s yields of vegetables, fruits, and herbs are donated to a food pantry that distributes fresh foods in Brownsville and East New York. With the garden open to the public in the spring and summer months, residents and visitors can cultivate their sense of environmental stewardship by expanding their knowledge on urban farming and the benefits of green infrastructure in an experiential way. During COVID-19, the garden pivoted from initial plans to focus on producing hundreds of pounds of fresh produce each week to neighborhood groups giving out food to residents in need.
  • Community engagement and equitable park access: Between 2008 and 2010, the broader New York City community was engaged through surveys, exhibits, tours, presentations, and meetings to help envision the redevelopment of the island. To this day, the Trust for Governors Island continues community engagement as it plans for future phases of development and transformation. To ensure that the park is accessible to all, Governors Island has partnered with various agencies to offer free ferry rides to many visitors, including residents of New York City Housing Authority housing, seniors, children, current and former military servicemembers, and anyone with an IDNYC (a municipal identification card for New York City residents). The island’s enhanced accessibility efforts have proved valuable. In 2020, 40 percent of all visitors accessed the island at no cost, and overall, 99 percent of all New York City zip codes are represented in annual visitors to the island. The creation and preservation of high-quality open space for recreation, leisure, social gatherings, public events, and educational purposes continue to help draw an estimated 1 million visitors each year.

Value Proposition

Added amenity. While the island’s northern, elevated side long housed a military base and a coast guard, the southern side was largely neglected after being created by dumping landfill material from the Lexington Avenue subway line in 1905. Today, the completed Hills is a series of raised landscapes providing a series of defenses against future floods and rising sea levels without the use of seawalls. Visitors can enjoy the island’s entire 2.2-mile (3.5 km) promenade with the opening of the Hills and the popular Picnic Point. Prior, the southern portions of the promenade and Picnic Point had been closed since 2012. These new amenities, designed with coastal and flood resilience in mind, offer new opportunities for recreation and play.

Increased developable land. Anticipating future real estate opportunities and the value of mixed-use development, the island designated 33 acres (13.3 ha) on its southern side for future real estate. The island’s Historic District also hosts over 40 existing buildings available for reuse and leasing. To bring Governors Island’s commitment to sustainable and resilient design to life, plans are underway to establish the Center for Climate Solutions. The center will act as a hub that brings together interdisciplinary research focused on developing, testing, and scaling new tools for climate solutions with meaningful public engagement through educational and cultural experiences. The forward-thinking approach to resilience strategies coupled with this new center ensures that the park and the island not only will survive many future climate threats, but also will help create even better climate solutions for an ever-evolving crisis.

Lessons Learned

  • Co-benefits for people and the planet: Governors Island demonstrates how resilient design strategies can create a host of co-benefits for people and the planet. Features like the wave-mitigating park benches and the raised Hills serve both human and climate adaptation needs—for rest and recreation, and protection against sea-level rise and extreme weather events, respectively. These design features highlight the interconnectedness of human experiences in parks and the preservation of open space to help future-proof natural hazards.
  • Ensuring equitable access: A successful park fosters inclusivity and prioritizes access for low-income communities of color that are unevenly affected by a lack of green space access. Governors Island addresses an important disparity in park and green space access by offering free admission, free ferry rides from Manhattan to the island, and free public programming to engage the community at large.
  • Persistent care and programming: Beyond Governors Island staff members and volunteers who provide ongoing stewardship, the park’s robust, year-round programming draws visitors to engage with the space in hands-on ways. The park serves as a venue for a variety of local organizations and offers events that provide environmental education and an appreciation for arts and culture. A small sampling of community events includes ice carving, jazz shows, wildlife walking tours, pop-up markets, and nature painting.

Clippership Wharf

Over the last several decades, Boston Harbor has seen a sharp increase in the number and intensity of extreme events, with 100-year storms and even 500-year storms becoming more common every year. A 2016 study from the Boston Research Advisory Group (BRAG) states that by 2050, sea levels may be as much as 1.5 feet (0.45 m) higher than they were in 2000, and by 2070 they may be as much as 3 feet (0.9 m) higher than in 2000.1 Higher sea levels increase the frequency of dangerous high-tide flooding, increase the intensity of storm surges and wave height, and erode shorelines. This type of sea-level rise could be devastating for large areas of the city, nearly half of which was built on low-lying landfill just above the high-tide line.  

The city also lacks a robust seawall, making waterfront properties even more vulnerable to flooding during storm events and high tides. As a result, when Lendlease acquired the 12-acre (4.8 ha) waterfront site, five acres (2 ha) of which are watersheet (tidelands), the firm had a lot to consider. A desire to build an asset that would operate successfully for more than 100 years drove the project team to embed resilience and sustainability into all aspects of the development. After conducting robust climate risk analyses and engineering studies for the site, it became clear that innovative solutions were necessary to ensure that the property—and its 1,700 linear feet (518 m) of harborfront—weathered future storms. 

In the early 1800s, the site was home to East Boston’s historic shipbuilding and maritime industry, and throughout the years had seen a variety of uses. Since the 1990s, the parcel had served as a parking lot and consisted of vegetation intermingled with dilapidated wharf structures and piles. Lendlease acquired the site in March 2016 and began construction in August of the same year.  

The development consists of 478 residential units across four structures: two condominium buildings with 194 residences and two apartment buildings with 284 market-rate rental units. The site also contains 30,000 square feet (2,800 sq m) of common, amenity, and public areas, including three retail outlets. A central courtyard space anchors the site and features a variety of amenities for both residents and the public, including a large amphitheater, a dog park, art, and natural plantings. The development also knits together a section of Boston’s 43-mile (69 m) Harborwalk system, connecting the project with the broader neighborhood and providing active transportation opportunities along the waterfront.   

It was important for Lendlease to invest in the East Boston neighborhood—not only through the amenities and design of Clippership Wharf, but also through the provision of affordable housing. To fulfill the city’s affordable housing requirement, Lendlease partnered with Winn Development and the Boston Housing Authority to enable the development of 22 deeply affordable rental units and 30 mixed-income condominiums on an adjacent site, 14 of which are affordable. Previously, the neighboring site had been home to only 20 units that were greatly in need of repair. By redeveloping the Boston Housing Authority site, Lendlease surpassed the city’s affordable housing requirement and created a win/win for the neighborhood.  

Clippership Wharf is best known for its innovative approach to safeguarding against sea-level rise and urban flooding. A variety of unique elements advance resilience on the site while adding green space and waterfront access in East Boston. Shoreline mitigation measures include a raised ground plane, stabilization of existing seawalls, new wetland resource areas, rain gardens and bioswales, as well as the update of neighborhood stormwater infrastructure.  

In addition to raising the ground plane, Lendlease incorporated a first-of-its-kind living shoreline that celebrates the tidal fluctuations of the site and buffers the site against sea-level rise and storm events, absorbing and dissipating wave energy. The project achieved Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) v4 Silver certification for Neighborhood Development, and has received national awards and recognition for its innovative and resilient design.  

 

INNOVATIVE FEATURES/MITIGATION TECHNIQUES 

Elevated ground plane. Lendlease set entrances to the residential units 14 feet (4.3 m) above mean high tide, well beyond guidelines from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Whereas FEMA uses analyses of past flooding events to dictate building guidelines, Lendlease wanted Clippership Wharf to be forward looking in its design and operations, knowing that storms are increasing in severity and becoming less predictable with climate change. In addition, raising the site to a higher elevation achieved remediation goals by reducing the amount of contaminated soil that needed to be excavated and removed.  

Living shoreline. A living shoreline naturally buffers the project from changing tides instead of using seawalls and other fortifications to hold the water back from building structures. The shoreline features a series of salt marsh terraces that dissipate waves during storm surges. Repurposed granite blocks from the site’s previous uses were used to create the terraces, which provide habitat for repatriating native species in the intertidal zone. Boston Harbor’s daily 10-foot (3 m) tidal fluctuation causes a dramatic transformation of the site throughout the day, with the water as little as 12 feet (3.6 m) from the edge of buildings at high tide. 

“It’s the first time in modern city history that a project on the harbor has created an intertidal zone with the pure intention of celebrating the tidal fluctuations with the plant communities and the wildlife habitat that it brings,” says Rob Adams, principal landscape architect at Halvorson Design.  

Green space and public access. Anchored by a publicly accessible central courtyard, the property features significant green and open space with native plantings that absorb rainfall to reduce the risk of flooding on site and to neighboring properties. Green infrastructure includes rain gardens and a groundwater recharge system to capture and improve the quality of stormwater runoff.  The site’s open space not only mitigates flood risk, but also incorporates amenities—such as a large amphitheater, a dog park, and docks—that the community is invited to enjoy. 

Redundancy in building systems. An important element of Lendlease’s resilience strategy for the project was to have redundancy in various building systems. Instead of having a central plant, the site has multiple air-handling units to allow for continued operations in the event of an emergency in which building segments might be damaged.  

Renewable energy. Solar panels on the roof ensure grid resilience and support a transition to renewable energy sources. The solar panels generated 200 megawatt-hours in the first year of operation, which is enough energy to power 25 to 50 homes annually.   

Soft mitigation strategies. In addition to investing in what Lendlease referred to as “hard” mitigation strategies, like elevating the ground plane, the company incorporates “soft” mitigation measures into the project, which focus on the day-to-day operations of the facilities. The soft mitigation elements include deployable flood barriers to protect low-lying areas as well as clear instructions for staff in case of an emergency, safe egress routes, and methods for accessing important supplies. The combination of hard and soft mitigation techniques has been so successful that Lendlease has incorporated similar strategies into other waterfront projects the company is developing. 

 

BUSINESS OUTCOME 

Clippership Wharf has been successful in terms of resilience paybacks, high tenant demand, and industry recognition. The development has:  

  • Avoided losses and damages. As a result of its resilient features and living shoreline, Clippership Wharf has created value by avoiding up to an estimated $2 million in claims per major storm event. As the frequency of storm events increases, Lendlease’s initial investment will pay itself off within a relatively short time frame. 
  • Benefited from high demand. Demand at Clippership Wharf has been strong: the development was 96 percent leased less than a year after it opened, with the first 80 condo units selling in just eight weeks prior to the development’s full opening.  
  • Achieved high return on investment (ROI): Rents reflected a 5 to 10 percent premium due to the desirability of the resilience and sustainability features.  
  • Received national recognition and awards, including the following:  
    • 2021 New England Project of the Year by the Engineering News-Record; 
    • 2020 Climate Change Project of the Year by the Environmental Business Council of New England; 
    • 2021 Design Merit Award from the Boston Society of Landscape Architects; and 
    • 2020 Excellence on the Waterfront Award from the Waterfront Center. 

In addition to its impressive financial performance, Clippership has delivered significant benefit to the East Boston community. The development enabled public waterfront access in the area for the first time in more than 30 years. From the project’s earliest conception, Lendlease wanted to create a waterfront experience around real access and inclusion that knit the community together, rather than hiding the harbor behind bollards and chains. Public sculptures and artwork by local artists are featured prominently throughout site, creating a welcoming and inclusive public realm. 

LESSONS LEARNED 

The development process was not without its challenges. At the time, the regulatory environment was not set up to approve the higher ground plane or the living shoreline concept. Initially, local agencies were skeptical and thought that the higher elevation of the site would block public access and limit integration with the broader neighborhood. In response, Lendlease redesigned internal roadways, ramps, and stairs to prioritize pedestrian pathways to and through the site, preserving water views and expanding public access.  

The Lendlease team patiently worked through many regulatory obstacles to realize their aspirations for the site. Now, Clippership Wharf is held up as a prime example of resilient waterfront design, and the same agencies that initially pushed back are asking other waterfront developers to model their projects off Clippership. “The lasting legacy of the project will be how it pushed the dialogue around resilience in Boston,” says Nick Iselin, executive general manager at Lendlease Americas.  

Lendlease has incorporated lessons learned during the development of Clippership Wharf into its other waterfront projects, like 1 Java Street in Brooklyn, New York. While the living shoreline at Clippership has been great at bracketing the tides, the way in which the ecosystem has evolved was not entirely predictable. “We’ve learned a lot about what it takes to get various species of salt marsh to take hold and propagate, for instance,” says Sara Neff, head of sustainability at Lendlease Americas, “and we’re taking these lessons and applying them to our other projects to ensure the health of shoreline ecosystems in addition to the protection of residents and our projects.”  

Choosing to integrate resilience and sustainability into Clippership Wharf extends beyond providing a financial ROI to the development and ownership teams. The waterfront access, native plantings, and green space provide community benefit to the residents and surrounding neighborhoods. “We wanted to create a waterfront experience that looked and felt different from any other one in Boston,” Iselin says. “We wanted to create a unique public space that invites people to participate.”  

“Clippership Wharf has been one of those projects that continues to evolve, and our own personal experiences are evolving with it,” says principal landscape architect Rob Adams. “On a grander scale, Clippership Wharf is just one piece of land along an entire coastline, but it has been inspiring to see how a single project has brought about so much change.” 

ULI is grateful for the support of The JPB Foundation.

Church Creek Flood Storage and Resiliency Project

The Church Creek Basin drains nearly 5,000 acres along the Ashley River and is home to dense residential neighborhoods. In 2015, a 1,000-year flood drenched the area, and the city of Charleston initiated a FEMA-funded buyout of almost 50 homeowners in Bridge Pointe neighborhood, within the Church Creek Basin, which has repeatedly flooded since development of the area boomed in the mid-1970s.  

Because of settlement patterns, land use, and discharge needs in the area, the city of Charleston embarked on the Church Creek Flood Storage and Resiliency Project “to lower flood risk and enhance post-event resiliency while ensuring the vitality and viability of the area.”   

The project is the product of a larger planning initiative, called the Dutch Dialogues, that started in 2017 to arm the city with innovative strategies and tools to combat rising waters and flooding in the Lowcountry. City government leaders obtained support for this project, which would harness insight from thought leaders from the Netherlands and other international experts, through an initiative started by the Dutch Embassy and funded by the Historic Charleston Foundation, the city of Charleston, and other local partners. Through this collaborative effort with the city and these global experts in planning, stormwater management, and climate resilience, the initiative established a city vision based on a new approach to thinking about the interconnectedness of water, land, and people, and their benefits to one another.  

Matt Fountain, the director of stormwater management for Charleston, called this collaborative process the “Dutch approach.” Fountain supervises a large part of the floodplain buyouts in the Bridge Pointe neighborhood, which includes 32 condominiums and nine townhouses that are all contiguous.  

Five-and-a-half years after the receipt of the FEMA Flood Mitigation grant, Fountain is overseeing the construction of public space on the bought-out sites, whose impact may ripple through property values throughout the Church Creek Basin. The new five-acre, $1 million public space will include recreational and water management features and is being funded by the city’s drainage fund and two National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (NFWF) grants.   

The project team, including conservation planning, ecological restoration, and design firm Biohabitats, engineers Weston & Sampson, landscape architects Surculus, wetlands habitat conservation and mitigation firm Wildlands, and public benefit conservation corporation Resilient Land Matters, are working on establishing a forest and wetland restoration projects on a total 20 acres of the basin. Construction is likely to begin by 2022. The Church Creek Basin resilience project will also include an ecological park for residents and tourists.   

The project embodies the design approach that came from the Dutch Dialogues, in that the city is using the water to its advantage. “We’re trying to convert this into some kind of passive recreation space, with water storage and space for native habitat including bald eagles,” Fountain said.  

With additional NFWF grants for design and management of the park site totaling $1.625 million, city leaders have been trying to upend traditional thinking about development. Rather than seeking an “ever-bigger pipe” to discharge inescapable floods, Fountain’s team aims to create parks and drainage sites that fortify the waterfront city’s natural appeal. As a result of this focus on waterlines and topography, Fountain says, “what would be a secondary benefit for someone else’s project is a primary benefit for us.” The grant is being used to construct rain gardens, protected wetlands, and other green infrastructure improvements on the lots where the homes were bought out and demolished in 2019. 

His team also aims to increase resident knowledge about how to manage water on site. A group called the Ashley-Cooper Consortium has joined the city in running workshops to help residents perform their own “green infrastructure” maintenance with cisterns and other fixes. Faith leaders have also done much outreach on this initiative to homeowners associations, Fountain said. “We talk a lot at the city about trying to make this one project that does lots and lots of things.” Using this program of work to educate the community on green infrastructure benefits and maintenance is a co-benefit to the city.  

The Church Creek Flood Storage and Resiliency Project plan hinges on recalculating the site’s value—not just for salability, but for floodwater storage. In taking land off the market, though, the team also recognizes the risk of upward pressure on prices in neighborhoods and on traffic throughout the city. “Development pressure is intense, and affordability is fragile,” says Fountain. He estimates the city will spend between $12 million and $15 million on property buyouts and the retrofits of these properties in flood storage. This includes the acquisition of between 50 and 60 moderate-income housing units in a city of 150,000 people. With those economics, storage value needs to translate to more traditional forms of value while offering multiple benefits.  

Exploring the frontier means new collaboration across communities and government agencies. The collaboration plays out in new policy, like the city’s Stormwater Design Standards Manual, which reflects debate among homeowners associations, engineers, scientists, and others who treasure Charleston for its kinship with the coast.  

“We see projects that emphasize rebuilding with resiliency,” Fountain says, “as a leveraged opportunity to send people back out into the market.”   

The Charleston Stormwater Design Standards Manual, updated in 2020, has key principles that include mimicking natural systems, designing for larger precipitation rates and future sea-level rise projections, incentivizing green infrastructure, and adding special rules for flood-prone areas. The manual translates stormwater design strategies into criteria required for permitting. For the city’s own projects, they must also score adequately on cost/benefit analysis, biodiversity, operations, and physical safety in a new stormwater project prioritization system the city developed with infrastructure consulting firm AECOM.  

Takeaways: 

Think beyond typical jurisdictions and borders for creating funding sources and innovative collaboration opportunitiesThe city of Charleston found a key funding partner in NFWF, which typically focuses on national parks but also offers grant programs with an urban/suburban environmental focus. City planners also gained tremendous value from Dutch Dialogues, a program which offered international insight and expertise and brought together a number of local stakeholders in the process. 

Take a “living with water” approach. Unlike other cities explored during research, Charleston did not solely predicate its Church Creek Basin buyouts on the impetus to stop repeated flood-damage claims. The Church Creek resilience project aimed to recharacterize a neighborhood in harm’s way as something harmonious with rising seas by changing land use patterns and investing in green infrastructure that would manage future flooding.  

Derive value from design. The Dutch Dialogues and stormwater guidelines have found their way into city contracts, documents, and formal policy. The Stormwater Design Standards Manual is used on all new private and public development and redevelopment projects in the city, while the design principles created the metrics for the city’s new quadruple-bottom-line stormwater project prioritization system.

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Floodplain Buyout Program

Historically, Charlotte developed significantly before floodplains were mapped. Therefore, some building took place in zones where flooding along creeks was more likely, said Tim Trautman, the flood mitigation program manager for Charlotte-Mecklenburg Storm Water Services (CMSWS).

“We considered various structural approaches to reduce flood damage, but we came to the realization that because of where our floodplains are, it was time to start un-developing.” —Tim Trautman, flood mitigation program manager, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Storm Water Services

Since 1999, Storm Water Services has purchased more than 450 flood-prone homes, apartment buildings, and businesses throughout the Charlotte-Mecklenburg region. The website touts their success: “Over 700 families and businesses have moved to less vulnerable locations outside of local floodplains. 185 acres of public open space has been ‘undeveloped’ to allow the floodplain to function during heavy rain and provide a long-term community asset. Storm Water Services also estimates these buyouts have avoided $25 million in losses and will ultimately avoid over $300 million in future losses.”

The utility’s authority, says Trautman, comes wrapped in compassion, and the decisions his team encourages appeal to long-term health, safety, and quality of life. Successful buyouts, backed with the county’s available cash from stormwater fees, can save property owners from physical and emotional loss. They also save the county from water rescues, overtime hours, shelter opening, temporary housing, and nail-biting unknowns that come from heavy storms. “Charlotte-Mecklenburg floodplains have a lot of urban flash flooding,” Trautman explained. “They require quick action and emergency response.”

In that context, Trautman nonetheless stresses the value of planning buyouts holistically, in accord with other public interests and benefits, such as local parks which usually maintain the purchased properties and planning staff who stitch them into the city’s fabric. Their buyouts do not end with the demolition of buildings. The property is put to greater public use, so the benefits extend beyond flood mitigation. “Even if floods come without much warning,” he adds, “flood buyout programs benefit from steady funding and consistent vision. The most successful programs are really ongoing as programs, backed by a long-term risk reduction plan.” Trautman said his team makes comprehensive plans for coordinating buyouts and flood-prevention projects in a few neighborhoods per year.

Growth brings more capital to the stormwater fee pool but also puts strain on stormwater systems even through Charlotte-Mecklenburg ordinances require substantial stormwater detention and treatment. Assessments of a property’s impervious area is the basis of collection of stormwater fees, which grow into a pool that Trautman’s team can dip into for buyouts. He notes, “Many communities solely rely on federal disaster money, and they sometimes wait one to two years after the event to apply.” Trautman points to CMSWS’s funding stream and specifically a “rainy day fund” as a way to speed up the process. “By contrast, we’ve closed on flood-damaged homes within a couple months of a flood and recently were able to buy a bank-owned distressed property about five weeks after bidding on it.”

That mix of quick turnaround closing and long-range focus matters, because Trautman says prices have climbed with flood risk caused by climate change in just the past five years. Trautman says the footprint of properties that the team can target has grown even though local prices for buildings, flood-prone or otherwise, have tended to climb even through the COVID-19 shutdown. “It’s a seller’s market, for sure,” he says. With ample capital, the utility can think about long-term benefits for the community as well as fair prices for each owner with whom the team negotiates.

Not every owner perceives the future flood risk in the same way. Trautman says roughly 75 percent of sellers respond positively to the idea of escaping flood risk, but every owner has a different perception of a fair price. “Balancing our need to increase community resilience with the need to keep the program voluntary is our number-one challenge,” he reflected. One response to the challenge comes from making sure that planning and buyouts occur in sync, so that relocated homeowners and other neighbors get to enjoy the new open space along the creeks.

Because of the voluntary nature of buyouts, coming up with plans that create public amenities and meet homeowners’ needs on relatively short notice is challenging. “It’s not like planning a highway, which takes years, and the land acquisition is a certainty.” So the team focuses on purchasing parcels over time and as opportunities arise that can add up to corridors—“one was pictured as a future greenway”—that attract stormwater and attract neighbors on the preponderance of days when most people need not think about floods.

The evolution from susceptible house to sustainable open space/park offers many opportunities for the county, Trautman added. His team and staff from partner agencies may also look at how a post-COVID city uses purchased land. Various master planning groups on which Trautman serves may reassess how the county values bike lanes, public space, and wider sidewalks, given the need for and use of these public spaces during the pandemic. With the real estate market “squeezed,” in his words, water-related disasters can stray from owners’ minds. However, his team continues to advance this work. Focusing on developing relationships with flood-prone property owners and strategizing about long-term uses of the properties could create amenities that also manage flooding. “The biggest thing is developing that relationship and trust with people,” says Trautman. “That leads to having them feel good about what government is doing.”

For example, the Doral apartment complex, which included 260 apartments on 19 acres, flooded six times since 1995, with damages topping $8 million. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Storm Water Services purchased the complex for $4.7 million, leveraging a FEMA grant for 75 percent of the project cost and CMSWS fees for the remaining 25 percent. By October 2010, all the units were purchased, and eligible residents were given relocation assistance. Across Briar Creek, CMSWS also purchased all 196 units in the Cavalier Apartments (13 acres) using the same FEMA grant/stormwater fee funding approach. With a combined 28 acres of land along the creek, CMSWS worked with the parks department and other government agencies to restore a large green space, now known as the Chantilly Ecological Sanctuary.

As a result of these buyouts, more than 700 residents have been relocated out of hazardous areas with high flood risk, and much of the land has been restored in various forms of open space, some parks and trails, that also mitigates future flood damage to the area.

Takeaways

Include each parcel in a plan. Successful flood buyouts not only offer a market price but also offer a vision of a more enjoyable city with hardier and easier-to-reach green space. CMSWS collaborates with city agencies on a comprehensive plan every five years, which details linear parks that can emerge from purchased vulnerable properties.

Bring the backing of your jurisdiction. As a county utility, CMSWS carries the value of the assets it purchases. It also brings consistent capital to buyout negotiations each year on the strength of its annual assessments. (If impervious surface decreases and brings assessed valuation down with it, the county would still draw on a dedicated funding source rather than relying on protracted FEMA payments.)

Connect with other agencies whose mission serves the resilient city. While each place evolves its own flood maps, Trautman ascribes some of his agency’s appeal to its coherence with the city’s neighborhoods. Focusing on creating parks, corridors, and—potentially—inclusive public life, the agency can present itself less as a collector of parcels and more as a creator of places.

New Jersey Blue Acres Buyout Program

The Blue Acres Buyout Program, as it is formally known, seeks to improve the slow approval times that keep homeowners from collecting disaster relief and the tortuous process of finding replacement homes. The program has impressive metrics that show its success. Since Superstorm Sandy, the program has secured federal funding for nearly 1,200 properties and made offers on 1,115 of them. To date, about 700 homes in 20 municipalities and 10 counties have been demolished, creating open space to provide a buffer against future floods, and an asset for recreation and environmental rehabilitation.

The floodplain buyout program was amplified after Superstorm Sandy, in which dozens lost their lives, 365,000 homes were damaged or destroyed, and $30 billion in economic loss was wrought across the state, said Fawn McGee, director of the Blue Acres Program and bureau chief for the Green Acres State Land Acquisition Program, at a ULI 2020 Fall Meeting concurrent session. Before Sandy, local governments struggled to process more than $100 million in pre-Sandy flood insurance claims so the state stepped in to help the municipalities with buyout projects that could mitigate future risk and losses, and most importantly help their residents move to safer ground.

Blue Acres, McGee laid out, focuses on “getting families out of harm’s way.” The buyout process is voluntary, and homeowners must apply for a buyout to be considered. Flood-prone areas with clusters of interested homeowners, in areas with local municipal support for buyouts, may be eligible for a possible buyout project. The program is funded by federal sources like FEMA and HUD. However, through a constitutional amendment by the New Jersey State Legislature in 2019, a portion of the state’s corporate business tax is also used to fund the program to ensure a more sustainable and predictable funding approach.

“One of the hardest parts of the buyout process is convincing the governing body of a community,” McGee said. “These communities are looking at every dollar associated with every home that we remove, and the biggest hurdle is getting that community and its government to realize that [what we are proposing] is the best solution.” McGee’s team must complete benefit/cost analyses for each home appraised over roughly $275,000 to qualify for FEMA grants. The team must also caucus with homeowners who need those grants and need a stable place to live. McGee emphasizes providing respect, continuity, and clarity to those homeowners.

She says the process comes in two steps: bringing local governing bodies on board and then working with residents. Evaluating possible buyouts with local governments flows from maps, photos, and discussions about their unique current and future challenges and goals. “When you look at the cycle of recovery in that one low, wet corner of the community, the governing body eventually realizes that those tax dollars could be going to enhance a healthier community for all residents. Almost immediately, I’ve had mayors say: this is great! We’re going to break even almost as soon as we close out, because of the emergency costs.”

Once mayors (who are especially numerous in this home-rule state) agree, McGee says, the Blue Acres professionals act as “advocates” for families. They use prestorm market valuations and require the appraisers to meet with the homeowners and consider the property owner’s prestorm photos of their homes, such as photos of their home “after a celebration,” to ensure the appraisers get a sense of the prestorm condition of the home. There is no transfer fee, real estate tax, or realtor fee for property sellers.

“As soon as we have the grant approval, we have a private meeting [between the Blue Acres team and participating homeowners], and we have police at the door [of the facility to help manage attendance],” McGee told the ULI group. “Staff are ready within days of the evening kickoff meeting to get out on the property, so the people can see that their government works.”

“I will meet with someone at their kitchen table or in a diner, and my appraiser will show them the comps so they can walk around the neighborhood and see how their value was determined. Our staff is always on call, and once the families are ready to accept our offer, we go to contract.”

McGee says the program has consistently earned public funding. “As the most densely populated state, we’ll hit carrying capacity around 2050,” McGee said. “Voters want to have a park that they can walk to with their families, and they want clean air and clean water.” The Blue Acres program is a part of the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection’s Green Acres Program (60th anniversary this year!) and is designed to work in concert with the initiatives and procedures set forth through the Green Acres Program’s Bureau of State Land Acquisitions, where McGee also serves as bureau chief. The Blue Acres program acquires flood-prone properties that will, similar to the Green Acres Program’s acquisitions, then become preserved open green space, expanded passive recreation areas, and enhanced flood hazard mitigation, in perpetuity.

One example of the Blue Acres Buyout Program’s success came after Hurricane Sandy in the city of Linden. The Blue Acres program purchased 22 flood-prone properties within the waterfront Tremley Point neighborhood and partnered with the city, nearby university, local businesses, engineering and construction firms, as well as other government agencies to preserve the area as open space for recreation and floodplain restoration. The project was recognized for its success through the New Jersey American Water Resources Association Excellence in Water Resources Protection and Planning Award and a Bowman’s Hill Wildlife Preserve 2021 Land Ethics Award.

The Blue Acres program is also noteworthy because of its role supporting tenant relocation. A requirement under HUD’s Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery program is to help relocate tenants affected by the buyout of their rental property and pay for a comparable living arrangement. In order to support renters and landlords more quickly, a tenant relocation program with a dedicated team was added to the Blue Acres purview in 2017. Since then, over $1.2 million in relocation assistance has been distributed and 51 households have been assisted, two of which became homeowners.

McGee attributes success to compassionate staff and “being good listeners.” It is important that team members understand that this is emotional and traumatic—the flood events, the history in their homes, putting their faith in a government program, and moving: “Nobody wants to leave their home and folks don’t necessarily trust the government.” In addition to the one-on-one attention provided to each family, McGee continued, GIS mapping of flooded areas can often help the homeowners see the storm’s effect on the home and neighborhood. A picture is worth a thousand words.

Anticipation and preparedness are part of the plan McGee sets for her team. The team tries to stay ahead of the seller’s schedule, so that when the seller has a need or a question, or is ready to move forward, the team is able to step in and help. Hurrying potential sellers, however, does harm. “I had a family who wanted to wait to move until June because their son was the quarterback of the football team.” she said. “And the answer was, like, of course!”

Takeaways:

Staff up to earn trust and to deliver services and support. “My folks all have phones and access to cars,” McGee said, stressing that homeowners must be able to expect a near-concierge level of service. That includes driving to meetings on evenings and Saturdays. Critically, it includes due diligence that creates a longer-than-forecast list of properties to purchase, in case sellers drop out of the program.

Consider buyout areas that consist of clusters or contiguous parcels to maintain the fabric of the community and leave the potential for the community to use these areas for future passive recreation and conservation amenities. The Blue Acres program considers the properties acquired through the buyout program as an opportunity to create a buffer that protects upland areas from future flooding, as well as land that can continue to provide value by creating passive recreation and conservation spaces for the public. McGee says mayors and taxpayers who get the math of replacing a ratable with a townwide attraction become cooperative quickly and for the long term.

Maceo May

 

Maceo May is the first building to go vertical as part of a master-planned redevelopment of Treasure Island, a 393-acre island in San Francisco Bay. The island will have all-new infrastructure, 8,000 new housing units, several commercial uses, and a considerable amount of open space. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers constructed the island in the 1930s in part to celebrate the completion of the Bay Bridge and the Golden Gate Bridge. It hosted the World’s Fair in 1939–1940 and then a naval base, which was decommissioned in 1994.

Upon decommissioning, more than 200 units of military housing were set aside to serve as housing for the homeless and were managed by four organizations, including Swords to Plowshares, the co-owner of Maceo May. Thirty-nine resident households will move from that ex-military housing to Maceo May in spring 2022. The building will also have 65 apartments for veterans newly exiting homelessness.

The building’s resilient and sustainable features are essential for fulfilling the core purpose of the building—delivering stability, supportive services, and well-being for its residents. “Our desire to build resilience into this building was partly our values . . . and also a direct response to the current conditions on the island,” says Joanna Ladd, senior project manager and development strategist for Chinatown Community Development Center (Chinatown CDC). Power outages are a concern to residents currently living in the aging former military housing.

Swords to Plowshares and Chinatown CDC plan to own and operate Maceo May for at least 75 years, so the project team considered climate risk on that time horizon. “We were also thinking about the broader Northern California context, especially the catastrophic wildfire events in recent years, which coincided with public safety power shutoffs and hazardous air quality across the region,” says Hilary Noll, a project architect and senior associate and sustainability integration leader at Mithun. San Francisco’s air quality index reached 271 parts per million (ppm)—a “very unhealthy” level and the worst in San Francisco history—in November 2018 when the Camp Fire burned just north in Butte County.

Resilience Strategies

The design was guided by a set of outcome-based goals developed jointly by Mithun and the building owners. At the outset of the project, Chinatown CDC and Swords to Plowshares participated in a health charrette with Mithun that established continuity of operations and mitigation of climate change impacts on resident health as two key goals.

The Maceo May resilience approach also includes all-electric power (no natural gas), solar photovoltaic (PV) energy generation, and readiness for net-zero carbon operations as the California grid continues to meet carbon-reduction targets. Maceo May also features passive design strategies and backup power. Natural gas is a vulnerable infrastructure asset in San Francisco because earthquakes can damage gas infrastructure and lead to explosions and methane leaks, Noll notes.

Net-zero capable, Maceo May is designed to maximize energy efficiency with an energy use intensity (EUI) about 70 percent lower than an average multifamily building in the United States. Air-source heat pumps provide hot water four to five times more efficiently than does a typical boiler. A high-performance building envelope that incorporates 1.5 inches of rigid-mineral-wool continuous insulation minimizes heating and cooling loads, allowing smaller residential heating equipment and cutting costs. Occupancy sensors and daylight dimmers also limit electricity use

All Maceo May’s resilient design strategies come back to clear health and quality-of-life benefits for residents.—Joanna Ladd, senior project manager and development strategist, Chinatown Community Development Center

The development team also chose to install an energy recovery ventilator (ERV) with a MERV 13 filter for every residential unit. The ERV reduces HVAC electricity consumption, and the MERV 13 filter exceeds conventional practice and will help filter particulate matter and airborne debris to maintain better indoor air quality, which is a considerable concern during wildfire events and heat waves.

“Given that Treasure Island will be under construction for a long time after the building opens and that we’re housing a population who bears disproportionate health issues such as compromised immune systems and other effects from having endured trauma, designing for good indoor air quality is paramount,” says Noll.

Passive design strategies and superior ventilation also limit energy use, create good air quality, and support the thermal comfort of residents, especially during potential power outages. Maceo May is oriented to take advantage of San Francisco Bay breezes. Windows are operable and have a low u-value of 0.34 and solar-heat gain resistance of 0.19; double-pane low-E glazing is argon filled (indicating a high level of insulation and resistance to heat transfer). South- and west-facing windows are shaded. In residential units, ceiling fans and operable windows located at different heights maximize airflow.

A rooftop 123-kilowatt solar PV array with on-site battery storage is designed to prioritize powering a first-floor community room that doubles as a “resilience hub.” Inverters link the array to both battery storage and the local grid so Maceo May has the ability to be self-sustaining. The battery backup system is located on the top floor to prevent problems in the event of flooding.

The setup powers critical building systems that support resident well-being, such as refrigeration (for storing essential daily medications), basic power and light (including for charging devices), and cooling for data and wi-fi closets that are specifically circuited for the ground-floor community space. The resilience hub’s operability during power outages is a means of minimizing disruption in residents’ lives, a key resilience goal in a home for veterans.

During eco-charrette discussions with the owners, we learned that many of the residents suffer from PTSD [post-traumatic stress disorder] symptoms. One of the best evidence-based design strategies to help someone with PTSD to heal is to create conditions of continuity in daily life.—Hilary Noll, architect, Mithun

Maceo May will also include sustainability and health and wellness amenities such as electric-vehicle parking, bicycle storage and repair, a forested healing garden, a playground and cookout area, and access to an adjacent community park and planned trail network.

Value Proposition

According to developer Ladd, the big takeaway is that “all-electric multifamily affordable housing is cost neutral at a minimum.” Going all-electric did not significantly increase costs, the design helped avoid some infrastructure expenses, and utility bills are expected to be much lower than for a typical multifamily building once the solar PV array is installed. Construction costs, which are bid out at $472 per square foot, are on the high end but not far outside the normal range for San Francisco.

Tax credits for efficiency

The financing for Maceo May is characteristic of affordable housing in California, benefiting from tax credits and tax-exempt bonds. Passive design and heat pumps (which cost more to install than conventional options) helped Maceo May qualify for federal tax credits provided to energy-efficient affordable housing. The development also received critical funding from the state’s Veterans Housing and Homelessness Prevention (VHHP) Program.

Avoided costs and operational savings

“Eliminating natural gas has an immediate co-benefit,” says Noll; the project will save about $250,000 by avoiding equipment such as gas piping, meters, and combustion venting. Another significant area of savings came from the Cadet heater units, which eliminate the need for the copper piping in typical hydronic baseboard systems. The money realized by the avoided costs was reinvested in the project via the installation of the ERV (a $1,200-per-unit cost premium over a conventional Z-Duct heat exchanger) and the resilience hub, an added cost of about $100,000.

Our efficient all-electric building and large solar array are an insurance policy against rising utility costs over time, which is huge for affordable housing developers with small reserves and operating budgets. —Joanna Ladd, senior project manager and development strategist, Chinatown Community Development Center

Future-proofing

By already meeting stringent energy efficiency and sustainability standards, Maceo May is positioned to adjust to any future legislation that increases minimum energy and sustainability requirements. California’s goal is zero net emissions by 2045, and the Berkeley City Council voted in summer 2019 to ban natural gas connections to new small and medium-sized residential buildings. Five other cities and counties in California are considering similar ordinances, and the Maceo May development team expects San Francisco to follow with a gas ban in the near future.

The development team also describes the solar PV array as insurance against potential rising utility costs. The solar PV array mitigates the risk of going all-electric before the co-owners have a wealth of building performance and benchmarking data on air-source heat pump hot water systems from Maceo May and other developments in the region. The solar array is designed to cover about 80 percent of the common-area loads of the building, which could be a long-term economic resilience boost to the owners.

Awards and public support

Maceo May is pursuing Fitwel certification and is on track to earn GreenPoint Gold. It is also a pilot project for the LEED Integrative Process for Health Promotion credit, a category the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) and the Green Health Partnership introduced in 2019. The city of San Francisco was also supportive of the development, making the approval process efficient and relatively easy. The city is committed to making municipal buildings all-electric and was eager to learn from the experience of developing Maceo May, especially because the project costs were within a normal range.

Lessons Learned

  • All-electric affordable housing in California can be cost neutral to build.
  • The cost of resilience features can be offset through savings from sustainability measures.
  • Engagement between the building owner and design team in setting outcome-based design goals preserved essential design features, saved time through the process, and illuminated opportunities to achieve co-benefits.

Empire Stores

The whole project hinged on the developers’ skill in connecting global placemaking wisdom to a historic slice of the Big Apple. The seven-building, Civil War-era complex known as Empire Stores came to bid as a byproduct of a city-state effort to redevelop 1.3 miles of former industrial waterfront in Brooklyn into Brooklyn Bridge Park, an 85-acre world-class, recreational, environmental, and cultural destination for New York City residents and visitors alike. The entity charged with the planning, design, and development of the park, the Brooklyn Bridge Park Development Corporation, operates and maintains the park. Its mandate to be financially self-sustaining spurred a limited number of revenue-generating development sites within the project’s footprint, one of which is Empire Stores.

Brooklyn Bridge Park emerged as a landlord, then, and as an asset. The success of Brooklyn Bridge Park capped 10 years of reinvention, both in the park along the waterfront and in the upland neighborhood of DUMBO behind it. That neighborhood’s former warehouses and rowhouses had morphed into luxury residential lofts, a commercial hub for technology startups and creative firms, and a thriving arts district that draws thousands of visitors each day. To lock in the neighborhood’s appeal, the government was bidding rights to redevelop the Empire Stores partly to help fund more attractions along Brooklyn Bridge Park.

A virtuous circle emerges between Empire Stores and the nearly complete Brooklyn Bridge Park. Today, this redesign of six former shipping piers attracts little children and their caregivers, basketball and volleyball teams, lunch-breakers and tourists who can gaze at the bridge to the north and the Statue of Liberty on the south. Empire Stores stands a few blocks north of the historic Fulton Ferry Landing pier, the location of the first ferry service between Brooklyn and Manhattan, that marks the main park entrance, fronting a lawn and walkway where couples often pose for wedding pictures.

The winning team quickly realized that a connection to the entire park, which was staying busy from sunrise yoga classes to sunset ferry riders, would also keep their site vital. Visitors to the park would wander over to the shops. Museum and office guests would snap selfies against the backdrop, spreading the site’s character across social media. And with a palette of grass and soil rather than concrete, the park can absorb stormwater before it reaches the site.

Plans evolved to fuse the park with the site. “We developed a program that would merge the whole ground floor with the park,” says architect Jay Valgora, whose firm Studio V worked on the building and landscape design. In 2013, the team told reporters that they planned a “Brooklyn marketplace.” Today, the ground floor features a mix of chain stores and restaurants, including a food hall whose vendors come approved by Time Out magazine- and national clothes retailer, J. Crew, which paid $140 per square foot for its space.

It also includes generous public space. The team cut an open courtyard, opening shutters onto the park and creating a path into a central stairway. It also focused that stairway on a public roof deck. For Midtown Equities chief Jack Cayre, the public space earns tenants’ affection and visitors’ admiration.

“When we were working on the project during the RFP process,” he says. “once we got to the roof, anybody from the most creative architect personality to an engineer just there to take measurements couldn’t help themselves but to stop, take out their iPhones, take pictures in every direction and really just take in the incredible vistas from that space.”

The Site’s Strengths

Cayre says he and his team knew all along that the waterfront made the site unique and hard to resist. The team also knew the public experience of the building would encourage people to cherish it, so members set out to make storm disturbances quick and forgettable. Cayre says he posed the following question: “Can we create something you can clean up after a storm with a mop, rather than something that requires us spend months tearing out Sheetrock?”

They learned, in investigating ways to boost the site’s resilience to storms, that its 150-year existence made many of its materials ready for anything.

When Cayre noted that Empire Stores’ original architects “never intended for people to live or work there,” and highlights an opening for creative strategies. In 2013, architects and engineers preserved and reinforced the stone walls and floors that had kept coffee beans ready for sale all those decades. These features also add a muted, natural patina that tech executives, furniture designers, and visitors and shoppers seem to prize.

The stone walls and floors that keep coffee beans from fermenting can also make returning to the office straightforward for 21st century professionals. “When Sandy came, the walls got wet,” Cayre says. “A week later, it was dry, and it was done.” This property led the team to think about a strategy that would protect tenants during almost any storm- and get them back to work within weeks of even the most cataclysmic storm.

They also had to form this strategy without recourse to elevating the structure. The waterfront location, historic-district requirements, and century-old buildings made lifting the structure onto a podium a nonstarter. Working with the site’s inherent materials and working through a series of models, the developers and their architects and engineers decided to make the place watertight while keeping its historic masonry facade and water views. They knew, though, that Sandy had sent seven-foot waves of water surging through the ground floor, knocking out columns there.

The site had comprised seven buildings “separated by massive stone walls,” recalls Valgora. He found a 19th Century painting in his research that heralded the stone-wall strategy as “Fortress Brooklyn.” In those days, the barricade kept the rowdy longshoremen away. To keep seven-foot waves from again knocking out the columns at grade, the team knew, the old shutters would also potentially fail. So, they decided to find a way to protect the building from a distance, as opposed to investing in on site strategies like elevating the building.

Good Fences, Good Resiliency

In choosing AquaFence, Cayre says, the team remembered that lenders had made the priorities clear. “The lenders’ first few questions were all about flood and how you are going to deal with it,” he said. “Flood insurance was definitely the focus of one of those questions. So that solution was put in place from the beginning. It had to be, before closing.”

The design and development team did this by procuring an AquaFence, a retractable flood wall that staff can store when the building doesn’t need it. The redesign also calls for placing on-site energy generation on the roof, behind an existing architectural feature.

AquaFence deployed around Empire Stores (Midtown Equities)
AquaFence deployed around Empire Stores (Midtown Equities)

Cayre and the team chose to use AquaFence partly because its technology had proved itself years before. The website for the Norwegian company that makes the flood barrier showcases deployments at office towers, factories, and a low-lying international airport.

“For us it was going to be this dam system that would keep the water away from the building,” says Cayre. “It was something that our construction and engineering people felt very strongly would give them the highest level of certainty in terms of it having a track record and being tested.”

Having agreed that it would cost way too much to try to repair the shutters, the development team appreciated the AquaFence’s simplicity. They test it twice a year for a day-and-a-half at a time, says Cayre. He sees training staff in its use as no more complicated than a fire drill.

Beyond the assurance these demonstrations provide, Cayre says the fence’s separation from the main structure kept costs and complexities from disrupting the project. Indeed, he describes the cost of installing, removing and storing the fence a “rounding error” and says existing staff can handle the testing and deployment without trouble.

The fence’s portable nature also helped keep construction on schedule. “Once we made the decision to do something not connected with the building, construction continued while were doing the research into the AquaFence,” Cayre says. He adds that the total project costs with the fence looked similar to early estimates.

Lenders endorsed the approach. The development team borrowed $280 million from AIG in 2013 for Empire Stores and $217 million for refinancing from M & T in late 2017.

The Hard Part: Restoring the Floor, Securing the Fence

Settling on the AquaFence as a protector set the team to engineering the site. That led to another challenge: restoring the water-worn floor.

As Valgora explains, 150 years of moisture and compaction had made the original packed-dirt floor into something less than a floor. So, before they could bulwark the site’s foundations from the waters that would soak it in a storm surge, the team actually had to create a foundation. “Originally, they were just timber soaked in creosote; There was no foundation. The only thing holding them up was 150 years of soil compression from holding hundreds of millions of tons of coffee beans, and that wasn’t going to work.”

Getting underneath the columns to create a new concrete floor kept the engineering team working overtime. They succeeded, though, in preserving the upstairs floors and walls. “The walls have the natural architectural character and beauty of the building,” Cayre says. “And if a flood did get in there [the walls] are not going to be damaged at all.” Higher up, the team installed an on-site generator. “There was space behind a historic facade where we were able to tuck in a generator on the fifth floor and not have it be visible from the outside,” says Cayre. (Rooftop mechanicals have become almost common in New York City after Sandy but would not fit the silhouette or mood that Empire Stores’ team had chosen.) This, he says, defines a backup strategy in the event that AquaFence or the pump system fails. “We think tenants would be up and running in weeks if not days.”

That backup plan, which experts call “redundancy,” defined a key benefit for tenants whose work lives flow over the Internet. Cayre says the backup generator can run “24/7,” provided a truck can deliver fuel to it. He also says that even after Sandy, trucks were able to travel on Water Street’s elevated grade.

Tenants, then, could potentially work through recovery from a disaster with no damage to anything permanent. “Business continuity came up with tenants who were touring the space,” says Cayre, “and we were able to very quickly put their concerns to rest.”

These include West Elm, which leased a third of the place and whose designers mock up new furniture in an office and whose retailers sell it on the ground floor. They also include Newell Brands, whose managers market smoke detectors, vacuum cleaners and other household staples. Brooklyn Historical Society even took space for a new gallery, showing confidence that their archived material would stay dry and accessible.

Today, Cayre says, the site draws people to the roof and from the park all day and has become a creative and community hub. “It’s really been as great as we could have hoped for,” he concludes. And he says he’s confident that three layers of security- the fence, the stone walls, and finally the generator- will keep it buzzing no matter what weather lies ahead.

Lessons Learned

If your main resilience challenge involves flood protection, you can invest in protections that don’t complicate your main building. By zeroing in on a dam-like strategy, Midtown and HK could satisfy lenders’ concerns about insurability and tenants’ concerns about business continuity without getting into the messy details of retooling a historic structure.

A new technology, if you can test it, can serve a historic site. The team hid its onsite generator to sustain their building’s historic character and keep the AquaFence tucked away. Other teams working in landmarked or distinctive areas may also choose resilience strategies that emphasize reliability over aesthetics or ingenuity.

Even in a world with superstorms, a site that engages the water’s edge can command a premium. Empire Stores opened years after Sandy, while news about climate change became more conclusive. Locals and tourists over the same span have made Brooklyn Bridge Park’s lowlands a New York City highlight. They pose for wedding pictures, schedule after-work parties, buy sofas and suits, and work long hours by the waterfront. The rolling edge and vista, and the convergence of old warehouse construction with new protections, make Empire Stores resilient to fads as well as storms.

FDR Park Master Plan

Context

Originally called League Island Park, FDR Park was designed by the Olmsted brothers (sons of Central Park designer Frederick Law Olmsted) in 1914. The 348-acre park is located in South Philly, one of the city’s most densely populated and diverse neighborhoods. FDR Park is currently well used, but has not seen significant investment in decades. Some park facilities have been closed to the public due to disrepair while others, like the 18-hole golf course, are no longer viable in the face of changing climate and recreation trends. The master-planning process was a chance to restore the designers’ original vision of the park as an urban oasis while adapting to the needs of present and future Philadelphians.

As Philadelphia’s only estuary park, FDR owes its existence to human intervention; fill material from the construction of the nearby Broad Street Subway line was used to convert the original tide marsh into usable park space. Today, the transformed landscape is still shaped by its proximity to water and tidal influences. The park also receives unfiltered stormwater from adjacent impervious surfaces, including I-95. Much of the park lies below sea level and water can drain out only when the Navy Basin is at low tide. Consequently, the park floods often. A tide gate installed over 100 years ago has struggled to drain the park effectively. As a result, trails, roads, and other amenities in the park show signs of significant flood damage.

Climate projections indicate that Philadelphia could see four to 10 times as many days above 95° F by 2099 and average summer temperatures could increase by 5° to 9° F. Average annual precipitation could increase by five inches by 2099. In a business-as-usual emissions scenario, local sea level could rise by as much as four feet by 2100. The park is an important natural asset for the city and has been identified as a resilience hub by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation. Resilience hubs are open spaces located near infrastructure and population density, where communities can maximize return on investment and achieve multiple community resilience and conservation outcomes.

“This plan is the act of balancing water, nature, and activity.”—Allison Schapker (Fairmount Park Conservancy)

The master-planning process began in 2017 as a joint effort of the Fairmount Park Conservancy, Philadelphia Parks and Recreation, and Friends of FDR Park. WRT was selected from 15 proposals to complete the master plan, which was funded by the Friends of FDR Park, a grant from the William Penn Foundation, and City Councilman Kenyatta Johnson’s office.

The master planning process included an in-depth hydrological study of the area, made possible by the William Penn Foundation funding. Most of the park sits in a 100-year floodplain and the park is also located in the drainage area for three combined sewage overflow discharge points into the Delaware and Schuylkill Rivers. With these risks in mind, the project team needed a complete understanding of how water flows into, out of, and through the park. The study tracked how water moves between the park’s creeks, lakes, and lagoons, and its findings informed the proposed placement, location of amenities and design of the stormwater management infrastructure.

Community engagement was a critical component of the master planning process. The team engaged community members through public meetings, hands-on workshops, and surveys. In-park engagement included mobile planning booth with opportunities for residents to give feedback by designing their ideal park.  The project team also hired 5 park ambassadors from the surrounding neighborhoods, to engage park users and their fellow community members. With 19 different languages spoken in the census tracts bordering FDR Park, much of the engagement work was done across multiple languages and cultures.

After a one and a half-year planning process, the master plan was revealed on May 22, 2019.

Innovation

The master plan envisions a park that serves both people and nature. Its design is delineated into two zones: the Urban Edge and the Ecological Core.

The Ecological Core proactively acknowledges the park’s flood risk by increasing the park’s capacity to manage water while simultaneously providing opportunities for visitors to connect with nature. “Mother nature will do what it’s going to do, and this park will flood,” said Charles Neer, senior associate with WRT. “We want to create a park that responds to the needs of mother nature and users.” Expanded creek systems and restored wetlands in the Ecological Core are designed to accommodate flood and stormwater, facilitating its storage, filtration, and movement through the park while providing a chance for visitors to connect with nature.

The planned wetland mitigation and stream restoration projects will produce a significant amount of fill material. The master plan proposes repurposing this material to create The Hill, a 36-foot elevated section of the park that will provide views of the city skyline and additional recreational opportunities. Fill material will also be used to elevate athletic fields and other amenities in the Urban Edge out of the floodplain.

The planning team often refers to FDR park as a “bathtub” due to its topography and tendency to store water. If the park is a bathtub, then the tide gate is its drain. In recent years, the tide gate and its associated system of culverts have not been effectively draining water out of the park. Replacing the tide gate is a top implementation priority.

Amenities in the Ecological Core are also designed with potential flooding in mind. Asphalt trails, which tend to deteriorate with prolonged water exposure, will be replaced with wooden boardwalks. Picnic areas will be elevated to ensure their continued use; an important consideration in Philadelphia’s most popular picnic site.

“The park needs to be flexible to a rate of climate change that we can’t predict anymore. We can’t engineer out of this situation, but we can adapt.” – Charles Neer (WRT)

The Urban Edge encircles the park, providing an attractive and welcoming interface with the community. “The park itself is a place of climate refuge [from extreme heat],” says Alison Schapker, director of capital projects at the Fairmount Park Conservancy, and the Urban Edge welcomes visitors with abundant shade and a network of green stormwater infrastructure, designed to manage runoff from the surrounding urban areas. Twenty acres of the park will be reforested with species like sweetgum that are expected to thrive in a hotter, wetter future. The master plan team also worked with Philadelphia’s Office of Sustainability, Water Department, and Floodplain Manager to analyze impacts of climate change, flooding and sea level rise.

Stormwater management interventions within the park are designed to exceed PWD stormwater management goals by managing surface runoff from outside park boundaries. Green stormwater infrastructure is proposed near the northern and southern borders of the site to manage water coming from surrounding roads.  This is especially important near Interstate 95, where 15 acres of untreated highway run off onto the park, creating significant maintenance issues within the park. Natural filtration systems ensure that the park can accept stormwater from the roadways without degrading water quality in the Park’s lakes or impacting park infrastructure

The City’s Green Plan, a long-term vision for the citywide open spaces, suggests the creation of green streets surrounding the park that act as neighborhood cooling corridors and comfortable park access routes. Although FDR is the only large park in Philadelphia that is directly connected to a subway station, most visitors arrive by car. The master plan aims to make FDR park a destination for walkers and bikers, both by improving trail systems within the park and by creating more welcoming entrances for alternative transportation.

The Urban Edge will also be home to the park’s recreational amenities, including athletic fields, playgrounds, pavilions, and comfort facilities. Some of these amenities will be elevated to ensure their continued use during flooding conditions.

The master plan anticipates the projected impacts of climate change and envisions a park that not only retains its recreational value in a hotter, wetter future, but also actively mitigates the impacts of higher temperatures and more frequent flooding. The park’s mitigative capacity extends beyond its borders, providing essential services to the surrounding area.

Value Creation

FDR park can only provide environmental, recreational, and economic benefits to the community if it is adequately funded and maintained. Concurrent to the development of the master plan, the team worked with the City and recreational consultant Greenplay to develop an operations and maintenance plan and operating proforma for FDR Park. As a result, the master plan reflects the importance of creating a self-funding park that balances opportunities for revenue generation with access and equity. If successful, FDR Park will be the first self-sustaining park in the city, generating enough funds to cover its operations, maintenance, and staffing costs.

According to Schapker, “Many of the things people the community are asking for will generate revenue for the city,” including bike and boat rentals, trails, athletic fields (which generate tournament fees), and food vendors. The 15-acre Great Lawn may host events while the multi-use trail also doubles as a 5k course. The master plan also anticipates ways that the park could capitalize on its proximity to three of Philadelphia’s major sports venues: the Wells Fargo Center, Lincoln Financial Field, and Citizens Bank Park by offering parking and dining opportunities for fans.

Maintaining consistent staffing is also integral to the overall resilience of the park. As Neer explains, “When the park has dedicated staff, they will be more aware of the environmental situation. What’s working? What’s not? They will be able to calibrate and schedule use of the park accordingly.” With a consistent revenue sources, the master plan hopes to make dedicated staffing possible.

Next Steps

The first phase of implementation will include the creation of almost 40 acres of wetland on the park’s southwestern side, completed in partnership with the Philadelphia International Airport. With the creation of a mitigation wetland in FDR Park, the Airport will be able to pursue its own development projects while also improving the hydrologic function of FDR Park and providing fill to elevate new amenities out of the floodplain.

As of July 2019, funding remains to be secured for the remainder of the master plan. The project team anticipates it will be funded with a mix of local, state, and federal funds as well as private corporate and philanthropic partnerships.

FDR Park is an example of a public/private partnership; an example of civic investment; and an example of climate resilience. The opportunities in all of those areas work together rather than against each other.” – Allison Schapker (Fairmount Park Conservancy)

Although it may be years before this new vision for FDR Park is fully realized, the master planning process provides an exciting path forward for the creation of a park that is vibrant, self-sustaining, and resilient, that can serve as a blueprint for park development in Philadelphia and beyond.

Sources

District Wharf

Developed by PN Hoffman and Madison Marquette, with partners E.R. Bacon Development, City Partners, Paramount Development, and Triden Development, The Wharf is a public private partnership with the District of Columbia’s Deputy Mayor for Planning and Economic Development. It is an ambitious project that has transformed what was once a low-density, commercial development strip into a bustling mixed-use quarter. Proactive investments in resilience and sustainability were key components of the development team’s proposal for this high-profile site. A strong vision for a sustainable urban waterfront helped the development team secure the site and advance this high-value project.

The Wharf’s 3.2 million square feet of development are located on 27 acres of land and 49 acres of water along roughly one mile of the Washington Channel. The $2.5 billion mixed-use neighborhood integrates many innovative ideas in waterfront design, construction, and operations. These elements include extensive and intensive green roofs, parks, and public spaces that manage stormwater beyond the District’s current requirements, cisterns to collect water for onsite re-use, a cogeneration plant for energy production, roof top solar panels, and a promenade and piers designed to resist storm surges and flooding. The revitalization project also is advancing economic and social resilience by providing opportunities for increased tax revenue for the city, high quality jobs, affordable and workforce housing, open space, recreation opportunities, and connections to nature in Southwest D.C.

The Phase 1 development of apartments, condominiums, retail stores, offices, hotels, restaurants, performing arts hall, and parking, as well as the waterfront park, promenade, and piers, was completed in the fall of 2017. Phase 2, in which broke ground mid-2018 and will complete in 2022, will include additional office, hotel, retail, restaurants, parking, marina, and residential development as well as significant public space improvements.

Mitigating Risk

From the start of the project in 2006, master developer Hoffman-Madison Waterfront and architects Perkins Eastman focused the design process on sustainability, authenticity, and connectivity. The previous 1950s-era commercial district on the site was composed of one to three story buildings housing large format restaurants and a motel. The buildings formed a near-continuous wall along the waterfront that blocked quality public access to the water’s edge. The Hoffman-Madison team leveraged the site’s location close to two Metro stations served by five metrorail lines to create a multimodal walkable, bikeable, and transit-accessible neighborhood, with full access to the riverfront and a new transit mode: water taxi, with service to other waterfront locations along the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers.

The Wharf features a permeable development pattern—an urban grid with a walkable waterside promenade with frequent openings to Maine Avenue, the waterfront’s main arterial. The waterside Wharf Street, a woonerf-style shared street, is the ‘spine’ of the neighborhood, connecting apartments, offices, hotels, restaurants, shops, a 6,000-seat indoor performing arts facility called The Anthem, the historic municipal fish market, a food pavilion, and underground parking for 2,500 vehicles. The urban fabric is connected by 14 acres of public spaces, including a waterfront park, four new piers, a new marina, yacht club, and recreation pier for launching kayaks.

The master plan focused on “bringing the connective city to the waterfront,” with the greatest challenge being “on one hand, calling for buildings to be built up above the 100-year flood plain, and on other hand, permitting people to interact with the riverfront,” notes Perkins Eastman Principal Hilary Bertsch. The commitment to sustainability and resilience, she says, is found in the design focus on connectivity within the site, making development parcels smaller for better permeability to the waterfront, and public space that constitutes half the site and provides systems to recycle stormwater.

Along the water, the property line is set back 20 feet from the previous development line to increase resilience to flooding and create placemaking opportunities with a 60-foot-wide promenade. Buildings are elevated an additional 1.5 feet above Federal Emergency Management Agency requirements. Some facilities, such as piers and the marina, are “designed to get wet” in extreme events. While the majority of the newly developed buildings have been brought above the floodplain, a renovated historic building and other new structures at the historic Maine Avenue Fish Market rely on floodgates and panels during major flood events due to the existing grading of the site, which could not be modified.

“The public environments are where we’ve incorporated a lot of those sustainability and resilience features, using really robust materials, things that are going to last,” says PN Hoffman Vice President Matthew Steenhoek. “From an investment perspective,” he says, “we are not merchant builders, and we spend upfront money on beautiful buildings and systems that have a longer payback.”

The Wharf neighborhood is equipped with multiple on-site energy conservation and production sources, including a cogeneration plant and solar panels. A natural gas 250kW microturbine cogeneration system installed atop The Wharf’s largest residential building decreases the draw of local power, which is primarily coal-derived. The microturbine generates continuous, reliable, and low-emission electricity which will service constant electrical needs in the below-grade, two-level garage for lighting, exhaust fans, sump pumps, elevators, emergency power systems, and public restrooms. The electricity produced on-site reduces the cost of purchasing approximately 1.9 million kWh of electricity from the local utility, resulting in a significant annual savings. In addition, the 1.2 million Btu/h of ‘waste heat’ created in this process is used to heat domestic hot water for the residential building, resulting in an overall efficiency of 64%. Lastly, the cogeneration system generates fewer CO2 emissions than conventional coal-fired power generation, resulting in a CO2 reduction of over 1,400 metric tons per year.

The site’s stormwater management system is designed to capture 3.2 inches of rainwater on site. This value is more than twice 1.2 inches required by the city’s Department of Energy and Environment stormwater retention requirements, which are among the most progressive in the nation. About one-third of the site is permeable, compared to 10 percent of previous development. Green infrastructure includes living roofs that cover half the buildings, permeable cobblestone paving, and rain gardens in the parks. Mature oaks were preserved, and 300 new trees are being planted. Three large cisterns housed in underground garages can manage up to 700,000 gallons of stormwater, diverting untreated runoff from the river channel. In the past year, around 547,000 gallons of the stored stormwater was filtered, treated, and used for landscape irrigation, toilet flushing in public restrooms, and make-up water in the co-generation cooling tower.

Creating Value

The Wharf is designed to achieve LEED® ND-Gold rating in the U.S. Green Building Council’s Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design for Neighborhood Development program, with individual buildings achieving Gold or Silver ratings. The plan exceeds many of the requirements of the District’s Green Building Act and the Anacostia Waterfront Initiative. Sustainability was always a critical component of the project and was emphasized throughout the project’s Planned Unit Development (PUD) process with the D.C. Zoning Commission.

The extensive investments in energy and water efficiency are also projected to reduce operational costs. All stormwater will be reused on site, decreasing the need for potable water for landscaping and other purposes. Financial returns include savings on energy; at operating capacity, the micro-turbine will recover approximately 1.2 million BTUs to generate hot water, which translates to a minimum 5 percent in energy-cost savings.

The project also presents economic development and tax base-expansion opportunities for the District. At full buildout, the development is projected to create 7,200 permanent jobs and during the construction of Phase 1, over 8,500 people worked at the Wharf. The project’s for-sale real estate, retail, restaurants, entertainment venues, and recreational services will produce significant annual tax revenues for the city.

Upon completion, the Wharf we be home to approximately 2,100 residents. Social returns include new affordable and workforce housing comprising one-third of the approximately 900 rental units in Phase 1 and Phase 2. Half of the affordable units are reserved for households earning 60 percent of area median income (AMI) or less, and half are reserved for households earning 30 percent of AMI or less. The depth and breadth of the Wharf’s affordable and workforce housing program greatly exceeds the Inclusionary Zoning requirements elsewhere in the District.

The developers aim to employ District residents in at least half of the created construction and service jobs and have targeted purchasing 35 percent of needed goods and services from local sources and establishing a 20 percent ownership stake in the project through Local, Small, Disadvantaged Business Enterprise participation. In Phase 1, this translated to more than $388 million in goods and services going to the local targeted businesses. The new parks, open space, and recreational facilities offer many opportunities for healthy and active living and social gatherings, important aspects of a sustainable neighborhood.

The neighborhood’s diverse mix of hotels, culture, and businesses with affordable, workforce, and market rate housing is unusual in a “world class waterfront development,” says Elinor Bacon, president of E.R. Bacon Development. She notes that outreach efforts such as inviting local residents to help design the waterfront park and a free apprenticeship program that trains public housing residents for construction jobs have engaged the local community.

“Social equity and community contribute to resilience,” says Bacon. “Strong culturally diverse communities in which people know, respect, and care for each other build social structures that strengthen the fabric of community. This is something that drives us. These principles and strategies exemplify our community engagement at the Wharf.”

High Point

 

Context

High Point has been cited as “a new model of cooperation” between residents, private developers, and government agencies to create a more sustainable and inclusive community for one of Seattle’s most demographically diverse neighborhoods. This innovative partnership between the Seattle Housing Authority; the departments of Planning, Development, and Transportation; and Seattle Public Utilities was formed to improve water quality for residents of this mixed-income community while protecting the endangered salmon run downstream in Longfellow Creek—one of the last four runs remaining in the city.

To accommodate this cross-sector partnership, in 2003, Seattle passed a special ordinance to permit low-impact-development features throughout the redevelopment of High Point, which would expand to include 1,529 units, 48 percent of which were affordable to low-income families to buy or rent. To balance concerns for neighborhood green space, pedestrian safety, and water quality, the entire street grid was raised and replaced by a natural drainage system that uses a new street network including pedestrian circulation, bioswales, a stormwater pond, porous streets and sidewalks, and multifunctional open spaces to create a positive net impact on the environment.

Innovative Water Management Features

  • Pedestrian-friendly streets. Narrowed streets, shortened blocks, strategic alley connections, porches, hidden parking lots, landscaped sidewalks, new utilities, mature and newly planted street trees, and walking groups highlight the aesthetics of stormwater features and promote physical activity.
  • Integrated stormwater management system. High Point was the first community in the state to feature permeable pavements in residential streets, sidewalks, parking lots, sidewalks, and basketball courts. A quarter-mile walking trail and gathering space was constructed around a 22-acre-foot retention pond and connected by four miles of grass and vegetated bioswales to naturally manage stormwater, improve water quality, and protect the wildlife habitat on site and nearby.
  • Sustainable landscaping. Organic landscaping methods were introduced on more than 20 acres of open space, including front and back yards, gardens, and pocket and neighborhood
    parks. Over 100 mature trees have been saved at High Point, valued at more than $1.5 million. Approximately 3,000 trees were planted in High Point as part of the site’s redevelopment.
  • Green building standards. Public and private developers were held to Built Green standards, a construction checklist and rating system verified by the local Master Builders Association, which included the use of recycled or reused building materials, topsoil, and pavement in the construction of housing and trenches. At a small incremental cost, energy-efficient appliances, windows, doors, and insulation were installed in all units. High Point features 60 Breathe Easy Homes®, independently verified units structurally enhanced to improve interior air quality for residents suffering from asthma.

Value Proposition

After integrating innovative stormwater features, High Point’s public and private developers achieved faster-than-anticipated sales and lease-up rates. Market-rate home and land sale proceeds have added revenue back to the city for neighborhood improvements through property taxes and to the Seattle Housing Authority for the construction of low-income housing through a profit-sharing model with private developers.

High Point’s success in improving the physical, mental, and environmental health of its residents has been reported by several National Institutes of Health studies and served as the model for green building standards in future developments at the Seattle Housing Authority. The community’s commitment to sustainable design and community development for residents of all incomes has garnered numerous awards and documentaries, including a 2007 ULI Global Award for Excellence.

“There was a magical match between people who embraced the ideals and virtues of green living and those who desired to live in a community that looked like America—not segregated, not one color, but a real mix of peoples, cultures, backgrounds, income levels, and so on. That was one of the drivers of pushing, from a marketing perspective, for a green, sustainable community. We saw that those buyers had more than one reason to take note of this new community.” George Nemeth, Senior Housing Developer, Seattle Housing Authority

Lessons Learned

  • Large-scale affordable and market-rate housing developments can integrate a high-quality, low-impact design. High Point achieved faster-than-anticipated sales and lease-up rates for over 1,500 mixed-income homes while developing a natural drainage system that infiltrates 75 to 80 percent of stormwater runoff.
  • Street grids can manage stormwater runoff while creating a safer pedestrian environment. High Point created an entirely new street grid lined by four miles of vegetated bioswales, more than 2,000 new trees, porous sidewalks, a quarter-mile recreational trail, and multiple traffic-calming measures, supported by walking groups.
  • Endangered species can be protected from contaminants through stormwater management. On a site that was formerly 65 percent impervious, High Point contributed to the protection of one of the last four salmon runs in Seattle, Longfellow Creek.

Encore!

 

Context

Situated between Old Tampa Bay and Hillsborough Bay, Tampa is surrounded by water, which ultimately flows into Tampa Bay and the Gulf of Mexico. Although Tampa does not have combined sewers or the requirements of a federal consent decree, stormwater management is a priority given the city’s frequent flooding and low elevation of three or four feet above sea level. Encore! sought to protect residents from flooding through the incorporation of district-scale water management that would capture all stormwater on site. “When you control runoff and cut down on erosion problems, . . . you don’t have that fear of standing water and flooding,” explains Leroy Moore, the Tampa Housing Authority senior vice president and chief operating officer. “It keeps the site safe, clean, and healthy.”

The centerpiece of the water management system is a water-retention vault that accommodates 33,000 cubic feet of water. The chamber is roughly 12 feet below ground, with a three-foot rock layer below the chambers. “It is the slickest, coolest feature that we’ve done from a sustainability perspective. . . . It is one of the most unique stormwater management systems in the state on account of its size,” explains Marc Mariano, then assistant director of site development for Cardno TBE. All surface stormwater is collected from the site in the vault and then treated through a system of nutrient-separating baffle boxes and sediment chambers that capture pollutants. Water is then stored for irrigation use. When the vault is at capacity, stormwater runoff is filtered through sand before reaching Tampa Bay. Over several years, water has yet to leave the site or be piped in for irrigation.

The project also reduces stormwater runoff through permeable pavers, native plants, and other elements. Land above the water-retention vault has been transformed into Technology Park, a passive educational park that serves to explain Encore!’s green building practices to area residents.

Innovative Water Management Features

  • Stormwater vault and baffle boxes. The 18,000-square-foot stormwater vault is structured with five-foot individual cubes that together hold up to 33,000 cubic feet of stormwater. Stormwater then flows through two baffle boxes for pretreatment before being used for landscaping irrigation.
  • Permeable pavers and native plants. Encore! manages stormwater in an urban setting by using permeable pavers and native plants that are not irrigation intensive. Pavers on the hardscapes and the median of the central street through Encore! contribute to stormwater management and create visibility for the stormwater system. The landscape palette is estimated to reduce water needs for landscaping by 50 percent.
  • Park with educational signage. Technology Park, a 16,000-square-foot park located above the stormwater vault, features educational kiosks, solar public art, and the district chiller. Visitors
    often watch the fluctuation of water in and out. “Once you draw people to the vault, you can educate them about it and the many sustainability features built into Encore!,” explains Moore.

Value Proposition

The investment in cutting-edge stormwater management features allowed Encore! to maximize the developable land on the site. A traditional retention pond and water collection system would have required six acres: the net gain of developable land from having used a half-acre vault is three city blocks, or about a quarter of the full site. Moore explains, “We were motivated by not having to consume a lot of that land with surface retention.” Investing in stormwater technologies allowed Encore! to be “a more valuable project and an urban scale,” according to Moore.

“We decided to put our dollars into infrastructure that would allow us to go vertical on our buildings when the market turned back.” Leroy Moore, Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Tampa Housing Authority

Encore! also benefited greatly from federal government funding available at the time of development. As Moore explains, “The recession hit and everything was put on hold, but we had the most shovel-ready site in the country.” The development team initially committed to district-scale green and stormwater infrastructure when it planned to use tax increment financing. However, instead of using that approach, the development team leveraged a $28 million stimulus grant to complete the site’s district-scale infrastructure.

Today, the Tampa Housing Authority is investigating district-scale infrastructure opportunities for another public/private redevelopment, the $2 billion Tampa Live project.

Lessons Learned

  • District-scale stormwater management can free up developable land and create a more urban development product. Using a stormwater vault rather than a retention pond not only ensured that
    the maximum portion of the site was available for development, but also fostered the creation of a better-connected street network.
  • District-scale sustainable utilities were a part of the marketing draw for the site. The market-rate units at Encore! were leased up before the affordable units, which the development team attributes to the location, competitive pricing, and branding. “All of our indications show that market-rate residents want to live in sustainable communities,” explains Moore.
  • Stormwater infrastructure provides an opportunity to educate and inspire. Stormwater infrastructure is celebrated in the park topping the stormwater vault.

Atlantic Wharf

Context

In 2007, developer BXP used the nation’s first green building standard, Article 37 of the Boston Municipal Zoning Code, to create Boston’s first sustainable high rise, Atlantic Wharf, which opened in 2011. Specifically, Article 37 incentivizes applicants with one Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) credit if they submit calculations for groundwater area absorption and retention rates. Atlantic Wharf is situated between the historic Fort Point Channel, renowned for the Boston Tea Party; the downtown Financial District, home to Boston’s financial centers; and the Rose Kennedy Greenway, a series of linear parks and gardens.  The building’s design preserves and integrates about 40 percent of the existing historic structures on the site and created 23,300 square feet of urban parks and plazas.

“We have been inspired by the mayor’s vision to make Boston the greenest city in the country and our customers’ commitment to a sustainable workplace,” Bryan Koop of BXP said at the LEED
plaque awards ceremony. “Atlantic Wharf is a model proving that development can be done with a conscious regard for the environment.”

Atlantic Wharf was certified as LEED Platinum shortly after its completion. BXP’s commitment to sustainability and historic preservation has been recognized by a number of award programs: Atlantic Wharf was a 2012 finalist for the ULI Global Awards for Excellence, received the 2012 Brick in Architecture Award, and won the 2012 International Facility Management Association Large Project Award.

Innovative Water Management Features

  • Rooftop garden. An 18,000-square-foot garden of modular, preplanted grids with native and adapted landscaping allows stormwater filtration, permits easy repair and maintenance access to the roof, reduces the heat-island effect, and minimizes impact on the microclimate. • Rainwater cistern. Seventy-one drainage points and over a half mile of piping funnel stormwater from the roof to a 40,000-gallon-capacity storage tank.
  • Automatic filtration system. Environmental pollutants in the stormwater are cleaned and collected from the rooftop rainwater harvesting system.
  • Rooftop cooling tower. Filtered stormwater is used for irrigating the rooftop garden and for replacing water lost because of evaporation, leaks, or discharge in the cooling system.
  • Public parks and plazas. Over 30 percent of the site area contains native and adapted planting, not only on the green roof, but also in the public Waterfront Plaza and promenade, where programming is provided throughout the year.
  • Water-efficient fixtures. Low-flow plumbing fixtures, such as shower heads, sinks, and dual-flush toilets, are included in all units, and similar fixtures are required for all office tenants.

Value Proposition

Atlantic Wharf’s LEED Platinum certification level has translated into significant operational savings and increased market demand for its commercial and residential units. Within the first year of
opening, Atlantic Wharf was 100 percent leased, outperforming the local market for office, residential, and retail spaces. By July 2012, residential rental rates were some of the highest in the city, averaging $4.24 per square foot, and all four restaurants reported higher-than-forecast sales. Atlantic Wharf’s resource- and water-efficient design has also led to cost and resource savings. Potable water use for irrigation has been reduced by more than 60 percent through native planting and rainwater harvesting systems on the rooftop and in the public spaces. The development’s rooftop cooling tower, which uses rainwater, saves 15 percent in process water compared to conventional HVAC systems.

Lessons Learned

  • Innovative water and environmental features can aid in leasing high-density developments and provide marketing value. Within its first year of opening, Atlantic Wharf was 100 percent leased and had some of the highest residential rents in the city.
  • Historic preservation can be achieved while realizing gains in water efficiency. Atlantic Wharf, Boston’s first green skyscraper, renovated and integrated 42 percent of the existing historic structures, including streetscapes and facades. The innovative water management system decreased potable water use for on-site irrigation by over 60 percent and saved 15 percent in process water in its cooling systems.
  • Public space is an asset for filtering stormwater runoff and increasing the marketability of a site. At Atlantic Wharf, 23,300 square feet of urban parks and plazas absorb and filter stormwater between the modern Financial District and the historic Fort Point Channel.